Periprostatic Neurolysis in Prostate Cancer
Conditions
PROSTATE CANCER, NERVES, NEUROBIOLOGY OF CANCER, NEUROLYSISSummary
The purpose of this research study is to assess whether inhibiting nerve activity to the prostate delays progression of disease in men with high-risk clinical features for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has been shown to invade nerves, a mechanism that is thought to be involved in prostate cancer spread in men with high-risk cancer. When nerve activity to the prostate is blocked in mice with prostate cancer, prostate cancer growth and spread are inhibited. In a previous study we showed that doing so in humans was safe and may have anticancer therapeutic effect. In this study we will test whether one versus two injections of nerve blocking agent is more effective at reducing nerves in the prostate and whether it will slow/stop spread of prostate cancer after treatment.
Detailed Description
Men with high-risk prostate cancer are at the greatest risk for clinical progression, with 22 to 40% developing metastatic disease within 10 years of initial treatment. Furthermore, the finding of perineural invasion (PNI) on pathology (when prostate cancer cells invade the nerves that innervate the prostate), is associated with higher Gleason grades and an approximate doubling in risk of lethal prostate cancer. As 90% of prostate cancer metastasis involve the bone marrow, and 97% of bone marrow metastasis involve the lumbar vertebrate from which the pre-ganglionic sympathetic nerves that innervate the prostate derive, targeting this neuro-anatomic connection between the prostate and its primary site of metastasis is an active area of investigation. Therefore, development of therapeutic strategies targeting nerves to prevent clinical progression after definitive therapy for prostate cancer are urgently needed. In a Phase 1a dose escalation study (NCT06703437) we recently demonstrated that periprostatic neurolysis with 5mL pure ethanol was well tolerated with no AEs. This resulted in an approximate 30% reduction in prostatic adrenergic nerve density. The goal of this study is to optimize prostatic denervation by comparing the denervation efficiency of 1 vs 2 periprostatic ethanol injections.
Locations
1 location Found with status Recruiting
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
High risk prostate cancer as defined by NCCN criteria Desires surgical disease treatment (radical prostatectomy) Surgical candidate (for radical prostatectomy)
≤cT3a on MRI No seminal vesicle, lymph node, or metastatic disease on PSMA PET No prior prostate cancer treatment (including androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy, focal therapy, cryo therapy)
Study Plan
Single injection neurolysis
EXPERIMENTAL
Single injection of ethanol for periprostatic neurolysis
PROCEDURE:
Periprostatic neurolysis with dehydrated alcohol (ethanol)Description:
Pre-operative ultrasound guided periprostatic neurolysis by injection of dehydrated alcohol
Two injection neurolysis
EXPERIMENTAL
Two temporally separated periprostatic ethanol injections
PROCEDURE:
Periprostatic neurolysis with dehydrated alcohol (ethanol)Description:
Pre-operative ultrasound guided periprostatic neurolysis by injection of dehydrated alcohol
No injection control
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Peritumoral adrenergic nerve density on final histology
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in sexual health inventory for men (SHIM) score
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Change in post prostatectomy penile length
Timeline
Last Updated
September 9, 2025Start Date
August 3, 2025Today
March 13, 2026Completion Date ( Estimated )
August 1, 2028
Sponsors of this trial
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCollaborating Sponsors
Urology Care Foundation, American Urological Association